Blue states plan exit taxes to trap fleeing millionaires as tax revolution spreads

newYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
Eventually, every politician runs out of other people’s money to spend. Governors and legislators in blue states are running out of steam faster than the rest.
Currently, there is a coordinated wave of New tax proposals sweeping california, New YorkWashington State, Massachusetts, Michigan and Connecticut. The common thread? They all believe that the solution to their self-inflicted budget crises is to reach into the pockets of their most productive populations. If these residents decide to leave, they want an exit tax imposed on them when they move out. What? Is this America?
Let that ingrain in your mind. Exit tax. As in, we know you’re leaving because of our lousy tax structure, and we want to hit the door when you leave.
California’s hatred of capitalism kills the goose that laid the golden egg
The proposals are on the table now
California’s billionaire tax law is the crown jewel of this movement. The ballot measure would impose a one-time, 5% tax on the total net worth of anyone with more than $1 billion who resides in the state. Not their income. Their net worth. Think about what that means for a founder who keeps all of his net worth in a private company that employs thousands of people. And think about how many millionaires have made themselves build that company. You could have $2 million in liquid assets, a paper valuation of $100 billion, and California will present you with a $5 billion tax bill. This is not a tax policy. This is asset seizure dressed as justice.
Washington state, which has never imposed an income tax in its history, just passed a 9.9% tax on income over $1 million. The moment the bill passed the legislature, the founder of Starbucks Howard Schultz He announced that he was moving to Florida. shock. Starbucks headquarters announced it will move to Tennessee. shock. When the founder and the company leave at the same time, it’s not a coincidence. This is a message we hear loudly from countries that impose high taxes and spend large sums of money.
Michigan wants to amend the state constitution to impose a higher rate of 9.25% on income over $500,000. For Detroiters, the combined state and local rate would be closer to 12%. Meanwhile, across the border in Ohio, the flat income tax rate is 2.75%. In Indiana, the rate is 2.95%. You don’t need to be a certified financial planner to do these calculations. You just need a moving truck.
SEAHAWKS GM Warns Washington’s New ‘Millionaire Tax’ Could Hurt Free Agent Recruitment
This is a story about bad driving decisions
I want to be clear about something. I’m not here to defend billionaires. I am here to defend economic reality.
Top 1% of California taxpayers It currently provides nearly half of all income tax collections in the state. half. This is not a sustainable revenue model. This is a house of cards. And the moment the top earners — not just billionaires, but $500,000-a-year business owners, startup investors, and CEOs — start moving in, the math collapses for everyone else who stays behind.
Critics warn that Mamdani’s property tax plan could take wealth out of the state
This has already started. Six of California’s 214 billionaires left before the proposed residency deadline of January 1, 2026. These six people alone took with them $27 billion in potential tax revenue. Larry Page, co-founder of Google, lost $170 million Miami real estate He moved his family office out of California. David Sachs, who has lived in the state for 30 years, went to Texas and described the proposed tax for what it actually is: an asset seizure.
Here’s what I’ve learned in over thirty years as a financial advisor. Rich people don’t wait for the bill to arrive. They plan years in advance. The exits happening today were identified in law firms and financial planning meetings 18 months ago. Exits that have not yet occurred are now being identified.
Why should this even matter to you if you’re not a billionaire?
Democrats in Washington passed an income tax that they know is unconstitutional. That was the point
This is where this stops being an abstract political debate and starts impacting your daily life.
When high-income earners leave the state, the remaining tax base must foot the bill. Services are cut off. Or taxes are raised on the next tier of income earners, which are people who earn $150,000, then $100,000, then less. California, New York, and Michigan did not build world-class universities, hospitals, and infrastructure by accident. They built it on the back of a thriving private economy. Dismantle the engine, and eventually the entire train stops.
There is also a broader economic signal being sent here. When Washington is no longer a no-income-tax state, when California makes it financially risky to be a successful founder, and when Michigan penalizes its highest earners nearly 12 cents on the dollar, innovation, capital, and job creation go elsewhere. Elsewhere, now, Florida, Texas, Tennessee and Nevada.
California’s looming capital flight problem could reshape the state in 3 key areas
What you should do now
If you live in one of these states, and have built meaningful wealth, including a business, portfolio, real estate ownership, or qualified retirement account, this is not a news story to skim over and forget. This is a planning conversation that should be had with your financial advisor and estate planning attorney. Many of these proposals include exit taxes on residents who leave within five years of implementation. The opportunity to plan proactively is now. Not after the ballot measure has been approved. Not after signing the bill. now.
Click here to download the FOX NEWS app
The wealthy are not a fixed resource. They are mobile, organized and have choices.
At the moment, these options look very similar to Sunshine State Instead of the golden state.



Post Comment